If nothing was written down, just how do you know that the Jews passed down entire volumes accurately for centuries? And by the way, just what did Jesus say on the cross?
You make claims about what some god did or did not do. You are a material person. You can not make any claim regarding any god. It isn't even belief.
ooohhh yeah - push it real good! :)
Your initial statement was "According to the Jewish tradition Messiah was a son of God." As I pointed out, the text you quoted does not support that. To support it, you would have to show that the text you quoted refers to the Messiah. All you've shown is that the term "son of God" was used by some pre-Christian Jews, something no one educated about the history of 2nd Temple Judaism disputes.
In today's society, I'm guessing there is a professor somewhere making six figures who probably actually claims they are.
what I mean is
Deimie has a great link below distinguishing between atheist epicureanism and atheist hedonism.
Bingo, Sir T! :-)
In which the empirical source of Western Civilization and its secularized and alternately masked or disguised Christian origin and social fabric just happens to have achieved the coherence, consistency, persistence, etc in relationship to prophetic visions of God up to Jesus. With Jesus, the relationship became linked to ethical spiritual growth training that itself became compartmentalized in monasteries, and then divested from the monasteries? child, University education. Given the establishment of the United Nations by the vision of FD Roosevelt, who credited Christian service, and its role in Sustainability Science and Policy, the "subjective claim" has constructed itself into being tightly tied to some objective measures, after all. There?s authority, and then there?s, Authority. Hands up. ; )
I believe the proper term is "informed consent". If someone with STDs doesn't disclose it, the other person isn't making an informed decision.
Hey, we all have sensitivities. Especially regarding the very things we've had to endure. I have them too and I appreciate your sincerity and authenticity. I don't think you're being oversensitive. You've just had a life experience that would impact anyone.
You're right it is an organisational issue, in my head I was thinking more about innocent employees, probably a result of past self-policing which is where this is all wrong, independent investigators should be employed. And I agree no one should be exempt from scrutiny.
I forgot that lot! Nothing like fundamentalist religion to stir up hatred.
none of it "works" it just does or does not
Like I said......you say : " it is a fair assumption that the person was being an asshole"...... I am left to depend upon not only what those who SAY they saw the comment say about the comment.... but Folks who DIDN'T see it as well.
What particular god do you speak of? There is so many I can't keep up.
Water or oil based?
xscd says "absolutely correct."
It's just interesting as an example of a business turning away customers. Discriminating.
I literally eat like a billion slices of bacon a day.
Me neither. I got more outdoorsy as an adult. Never killed anyone either! A miracle! Praise him!
1. So, was Hitler Catholic, given his persecution of the Catholic Church during his reign?
"Really? You see no difference between saying someone is a sinner and killing them?"
The decision essentially said, yes, you can discriminate if you use religion as a rationalization for your bigotry.
I will not revisit the fuckery of yesterday's thread.
If false accusations & statements are made depending on the charges ie. rape / sexual assault etc. etc. & carrying a min. / max. of 10 yrs. or whatever the case may be & it turns out to be proven completely false in a court of law. Then those same charges or time as it were for perjury, should be applied & given to the accuser for falsely making the allegations to begin with. That alone, I think would drastically reduce all these false allegations that may arise in the future!