It works well without context!
No, I'm not changing the subject at all.
Those supposed Christians you mention who disbelieve God's Word, are merely compromisers. Compromisers are a dime/million. The Bible does not in so many words claim that there are no gaps, but more importantly, does not claim there are gaps either. We take it as it is.
Sorry, I read that too fast and saw:
Re-interpret my comment as having been written by a skeptical atheist. ??
Firing Comey was meant as both retribution for not stopping the investigation and to cycle through to someone who would. Nixon did the same thing.
The Dems spent a decade preaching that we should not care about Presidents private sex lives. Maybe it stuck.
Dems have obsession about Russia collusion. Have you ever considered that it might be a scapegoat?
Honestly though, what do "Darwinists" have to do with ANY of this? There are no scientists in the credible group that can be considered "Darwinists", and if there are any that fit that mold, they are not taken seriously at all by the credible scientists. You are focusing on a group that holds no sway over the progress of science, which is why most people are just ignoring your questions.
Most of the world have now heard about Him.
Oh please at least I had a class on ancient literature. It's obvious you have not. The gospels are dramas put in an historical setting written in the style of fiction. There is a stark difference between a propaganda laced historical narrative like Gaelic Wars and a drama in an historical setting like Sherlock Holmes. The gospels have none of the characteristics of the former and all of the characteristics of the latter. If it quacks like a duck....
it's a lake, you go and jump into it.
Though it is funny you accuse me of that, despite you ignoring and denying all the evidence we have that there was no such flood in human history.
Don't mean to sound sexist but that sounds surprising, I'd expect it to be the other way round. Like I know guys might want a girl to remain badly but not enough to bring a baby into the picture, coz of responsibility and stuff
It's so the women can't steal the used ones to get pregnant to trap the guy!
Exactly. There are some classes that end up being all women, even if they are technically coed.
I hope you noticed the "?" at the end of the phrase. ;)
Yes. When I read the same response over and over, with no relevance to the question, I think of "his name is Robert Poulsen."
You accept speciation, but not cummulative change.
What facts are you talking about?
False, because God is too intelligent to make a square circle.
Sounds good to me
Have you tried CVS Pharmacy?
Most, except for FSM. It's okay with that.
So the 3% atheists in Germany is responsible for the holocaust. How dense are you? The wast majority of people in Germany at the time where Christian and they are the ones who operated the gas chambers.
Sure there is. I posted several from various epistles for TFCC.
So, tell me, why should I be worried about that?
You're going to keep asking 'what is the cause', and then insisting that it must be your god, without ever even considering the explanation or analogy, right?
Two billion (pick your number and religion) people can't be wrong. Well there is 5 billion other humans that disagree.
In my head... "It is useless to resist.."