Sorry. :/ [passes the Scotch Tape over] :D
Exactly. Few fail to understand this. Plus, it's often a choice they made together for one of them to stay at home. If bills are paid and needs are met, who else cares what goes on with someone else's family?
Chased away? So "God" is a coward and has no sense of stoicism. Not worthy of worship ........ if it actually existed. But it appears to only exist in some people's minds.
It is very convenient to be able to define your God in any way that you like without having to prove that definition. You simply define your god as being outside of space and time and not subject to any laws of physics or logic whatsoever and suddenly your god is capable of being and doing absolutely anything, making him totally impossible to disprove. Of course, it also makes him totally impossible to prove.
"you've just completely reversed yourself"
Actually, there is a bit of GUI improvement there - you can type either in the old-fashioned single line ';' separated style, or in new 1-item-per-line thing that will be parsed into old-fashioned style later.
I heart you for this post... sigh, the White House is such an eye sore now. I hate walking near it.
Not when it was originally signed.
If they did not declare that he was arrested, then they attacked him,. He could have shot them all and be clear of penalty.
uni = one, but you are correct it's often used to refer to things that are sexless.
Ah, you'll have to excuse me for lapsing into philosophy from habit. :) In philosophy, "Being" (w/ a capitalized "B") is the opposite of non-Being; Being is all-that-is, living or non-living. Every mote of the Universe is part of Being, in this sense of the term. In religion, the closest approximation to this might be Hinduism's idea of Brahman-as-Being, & Atman as each individual "being" (uncapitalized "b").
No, that is clearly not what he was stating, but good job getting a dig in on religion.
I'd pound that.
Perhaps the rest of us are unfamiliar with the ?distasteful pop culture? usage of the term ?Texas Sharpshooter.? I certainly am.
All morality is subjective. It will change and evolve as we do. In a thousand years, many of our morals will have changed. That being said, some morals are more concrete than others (murder, etc)
The problem is : people who like Israel and Jews like Saudi Arabia, rebels and jihadists who fight against Putin and Bashar (but who behead or stone people on simple denunciation), so I can not trust these people.
Yes, I will call it stupid and illogical however. It is only adultery if its cheating. Its not cheating if they know and approve.
And what law would that be?
Yes to that. Someone in Psalms.