What evidence of theories have you discovered, Mr. Scientist?
Well, maybe. "Gulp"
Ok, so Doug's the biggest spender of all, with the biggest deficit, yet according to his opponents' ads he's going to cut 40,000 jobs, plus close schools and hospitals. The circle doesn't square. Or if it does it means the the cuts and closures will be worse under the others.
Did Obama commit any crimes with Ayers? Trump's committed crimes with ~Russians~ (money laundering).
WRONG AS ALWAYS COMMIE!
False. God does NOT make people homosexual.
It's already higher than 7% thanks.
oh, your one of those posters. fragile and pathetic. done.
Note that the question is not whether god(s) are
First, I've never seen you even close to another subject. Maybe it's happened, maybe it hasn't, but if you ever put up a single post that wasn't about race, I missed it. Second, who says it was about race? You, and other race-baiters who think that if you say something negative about a black person that it's because of their skin color, that's who. This whole idea that racism is at the core of every criticism of non-whites is retarded bullshit. Third, he was well within his rights to doubt the verdict. You don't have to like it, either, and it doesn't make him racist.
"Saying, 'religion' isn't enough, especially when there is no proof a god exists or even agrees!" Not according to the SCOTUS or the Constitution.
It is that!
Regarding the historical Jesus, no. Again, the evidence we have for a historical Jesus can't just disappear. Most secular, critical scholars disagree with Carrier's opinion on the historical Jesus because they have good reasons to do so.
I used to be a play leader in an adventure playground. The one thing we always prevented was the setting up of forts or camps. As soon as it happened, and a group formed, things would start flying and many tears would be shed.
Confirmed: Orange head is Putins beatch.
His death was real, both parts. His substitution and punishment was real. That's a sacrifice. Don't be confused because His resurrection was more real.
"The gene or genes in the Xq28 region that influence sexual orientation have a limited and variable impact. Not all of the gay men in Bailey's study inherited the same Xq28 region. The genes were neither sufficient, nor necessary, to make any of the men gay."
The only real problem with the scientific method is the human. You have to start off with a hypothesis, a guess, and work from there. If the person can't make a good hypothesis then the scientific method isn't going to work very well.
The progressive North Korean leader could likely teach President Trump some basic lessons in government management and leadership.
1. Matt 25 parable of the talents. The two who made a gain with what they were given were rewarded. The one who didn't make a gain, lost even what was originally given to him. vs 27 "Thou oughtest therefore to have put my money to the exchangers, and then at my coming I should have received mine own with usury."
Now Who's having a problem with comprehension?
Moral realism presupposes that morality is real, IE exists if there are no people to consider that concept. Moral realism is arrived at the same way that physical realism is -- by indirect inference from highly useful models.
"but there are many variations of the Truth"
You missed the whole discussion.
""We prayed and little Sammy got better", but they won't mention they prayed and little Suzie didn't. Or if they do, it's always, uh, the answer was "no" this time."
My mistake. Allow me to rephrase the question.
We have to pass the law to see what is in it...
It?s from the Federal Burea of Prisons. The raw data is here:
We are talking Donald trump. Did you think before today he even knew about the war of 1812? Think before you type
I heard CJ went vegan. He can have a good tofu salad.