Those numbers do not take into account the total number of potential species that could have evolved on earth, among which would be countless intelligent ones. The number of actual species that developed is minute when compared to the number of all possible species. This means that human intelligence is unusual. Why? Well, either it was a fluke or it wasn't evolutionarily important or both :).
Who are they?
People are human. At the same time, It's really great with your SO is focused on you. It really depends how often he's glancing at other women. Is it once-in-awhile? Okay. I mean, it doesn't exactly make me happy but okay. But is he 'glancing' at other women every time we go out or looking for ways to make it appear he's not checking out other girls when he is? Sorry, why would I want to keep hanging out with him if that's the case? I remember a long time ago hearing a man talk about how other men can handle their relationships. They can either invest wasted energy into every hot looking woman that crosses their path, actively getting nothing out of except for a few seconds of titilation that they will probably forget by next week anyway. Or they can invest their energy into their partner in making her feel cared for, loved and like the hottest freshest thing he's ever see and reap the benefits of that positive energy being put back into his own relationship..like an investment. I always liked that.
Clearly you do NOT KNOW GOD ......HE told us exactly what HE thought abt. gay lifestyle , it is an ABOMINATION to HIM . Not my place to judge anyone & I don't , BUT , do NOT tell me what YOU THINK GOD says when you clearly have no clue on the subject , ps, the ONLY "gay Christians " are those who have stopped living that life , no such thing as an "active gay Christian " , again not judging , just going by the WORD OF GOD . it's between HIM & THEM . You can lie to yourself all you want , tell yourself GOD has no problem w/ gays preaching from the pulpit , I disagree , I'm gonna stick w/ what HE said & HE made that VERY clear to all .
Stop insulting me.
I would glance, tops.
One can be bigotd towards any idea/person/group.
Except with wind, it is also independently verifiable. Your whole "I met god" is no different than a delusional person making the same claim.
What's your favorite dessert after breakfast in bed?
This! Thank you, Alan.
You have a serious need to reign that imagination. The LIBS got wiped out and you are NOT a place holder for 10 years. Seriously, C'MON MAN!!
That chart does not demonstrate your claim.
Paul's point is Christians, of any race are heir's to Abraham's covenant with God. How does it matter whether or not Abraham was a real person?
They all have a flood story. It was passed down wo mouth. Campfire. Its changed a bit, but the Jews have the original. Even native Americans have one..eerily similar. The Chinese too.
In my experience, there's no such thing as an "emotional affair". Been there and done that, and lost a marriage to it. Sorry to be that person. I like to think I've grown since then.
I did, over half are killed. And it's not my "often".
Ummm. You wrote ... " His Jesus of course as all scholars agree does not share much commonality with the Jesus of Nazareth of the gospels. "
It does, of course. Too many factors indicate it.
It is clear the purpose of the Bible is to defend only 3 words
I ansered your four questions. Your failure to admit this, is indeed on the table.
You?ll have to be more specific. ?Something as a lion??
YEAH!!! AND YOU DELETED THEM?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!
Good you found it....?? ?? ??
Do you honestly believe that is their main concern?
Should I tell him I think it's sealed up? lololol
There is no reason to deny Matthew's recording of God's Word. Not one of these men was looking for fame or riches. Indeed most of them suffered death as a result of their service. And, of course, you are incorrect about both Mark and Luke. Each wrote at God's dictation.
This is what you claim, without a single bit of evidence. I am not a judge to anyone, but I do have a right to evaluate a political doctrine.