Umm - no
Christians are perfectly willing to believe there's a god with no proof at all...none.
Same here. My grandmother actually worked out in the field when she was young enough. She didn't even stop mowing her yard until she was in her seventies, even though we offered to get someone to mow it for her.
Absolutely! Makes me wish I had thought of that. Maybe for one of my daughters. Which of course will be 30 years from now, but it never hurts to plan early lol
Yeah, it's a lot of trouble for someone to print a bunch of fliers or to create a bogus Facebook group. Hardly anybody EVER does that.
"Who knows anymore. This is crazy!"
They aren't mistaken.
Trudeau pressed Trump on how he could justify the tariffs as a "national security" issue.
Al get it straight he rammed into her, it doesn't make any difference helping her up the point is he rammed a senior citizen.
I was messin' with ya.
That the resurrection completely negates the sacrifice. I'd say it proves that is meant for us after this life of trials.
I suspect you will find far more children who don't steal because they might get caught than you will children who don't steal because they believe it is wrong.
Better? You really are a very confused male.
Yes, I complain about parts of the Bible that have problems. You didn't figure that out.
Who is keeping religion in check? Last time I
What a Moron.LMAO!!
I can say that I am not a racist or supremacist.
When I wrote it, I almost put "most religions" but ended up forgetting about it before I changed it. I guess too late now, but you are right. Not all.
It simply was not referred to at "Nazareth" in the first century.
There is none I have been able to find so far. Zero. Of course, speaking of CONTEMPORARY sources, not being based on Bible or chit-chat by "witnesses" that were born after events.
They already have:
For the most part, you don't need our permission. Read the guidelines and keep it in the overall spirit of the channel. Love, relationships, sex, friendship...stick around a bit and you'll get the idea.
Also, I just don't think the claim "it's not complicated" is tenable. Consider the Aziz Ansari case: there's real ongoing disagreement among intelligent, sane people about whether he did anything all that terrible or deserved to be publicly humiliated.
There are several ways to handle that situation:
The theory of evolution isn't some weak, fragmented evidence. You don't understand the evidence, and you tend to just copy and paste quote minned stuff about it.