1) No I mean like getting health and safety facts as they pertain to human sexuality and sexual activity from someone that knows the material. Not so cultist that provides bullshit
Yep, likely legal in his state sadly
Ohhhh that reminds me of a joke!
In nova, I have either never seen a homeless person or didn?t know they were homeless because they were not asking for money. In dc, this happened all the time. Ironically there were atms every couple of feet so you would go get money and bring it back.
39 but i still act like a teenager
To my map? It?s on the wall not the web
Humans. We're only 6000 years old. History proves that.
The Bible doesn't make me uncomfortable. What makes me uncomfortable is when people take Biblical passages out of context...
So, sucks to be an infertile HETERO couple who wants to get married, huh?
That leads to the question expressed in another thread are humans born good or evil?
good night bro.
"I ain't got no books" conveys substance. The two go together.
An expert in a particular field of study and a god are very different things. I'm sure if your doctor could make you stop doing harmful things to yourself they would. The god of the bible wanted Adam to eat that fruit because he could have stopped him but didn't. Unless you're saying he couldn't stop him. But then he wouldn't be much of a god, would he?
I never thought it was funny!
Swing and a miss. Free speech doesn't mean a right to not be criticized, no matter how entitled you feel to that welfare queen mentality of yours.
I don?t entirely disagree with your above position
I think it's safe to say that Paul, when he writes about the law, writes about the Mosaic Law. He writes extensively about the law in his epistles, and it's clear from the context that he writes exclusively about the Mosaic Law. It was the only Law that he knew, being, as he says, "of the race of Israel, of the tribe of Benjamin, Hebrew of Hebrews; as to the law, a Pharisee" (Philippians 3 v 5). He relates the law - the law that he writes about - to being a Pharisee, a member of one of the stricter sects of Judaism.
No, it's clearly you who has massive issues with reality and can't cope with actual facts, so has to attack others.
No, I really don't. I've not needed your god for my whole life. I've been doing fine without him. And since your god likes to casually murder children, I think I'll be fine never interacting with him.
I cannot believe people still do that shit.
Im very sorry for your experiences. That is very wrong, Shannon.
if new discoveries point to something eg black holes, dark matter, and even though we can't actually for sure prove it ( at least I think we can't last I heard) that doesn't mean black holes and dark matter don't exist.
It will be interesting to see if Trump pardons Manafort, just because he can.
What you wrote was purely anecdotal. And you know this.
You make a claim: "reality gives us reason to believe WE are tuned to exist here"
The song really is pure genius. It was finding someone like Harris to do it.
Capt. Donald J. BabbleDump reporting for doodie!
Because democrats hate America as much as the terrorist...
Like I said, you need to show the numbers, are they paying the same insurance as other businesses? This is important information that is constantly left out of these articles. When I hear about small businesses struggling to stay open, they are trying to keep up with these bills. I want to know if the businesses that are hiring illegal immigrants are paying insurance on those illegal immigrants as well since that would normally cost any other employer twice or more the pay of a legal working employee. These businesses that are used as examples as successful enterprises should not be used against other companies that are working hard to follow the law, and how can we say "they aren't taking work from Americans." when we haven't been trying? I see American's working the isles of Walmart, cleaning grease pits at fast food joints, and much worst places. Why should we assume that any American would not want any job?
If there are all these possibilities to explain away the claims of the resurrection, how can you even consider it actually happened without having an explanation for the mechanism for which a resurrection after three days of being dead could even be possible?