In your opinion!
LOL,aww your mad LOL
1. Not me. My dad was circumcised, my parents decided it wasn't necessary for me.
Wanker, you still a pedophile and you haven't' told your daddy yet? Shame on you.
I agree that the 7 questions are not particularly apt. But the OP is interesting. I particularly agree with Stephen Jay Gould and Denis Noble. Being biased against religion is an influence in evolutionary science, at least among some scientists. The question is whether a sort of paranoia about "letting God back in" is hemming in scientific inquiry to a strictly reductionist point of view.
Well, when I did this it was to friends and such, not randos. We used to joke around like that and clown each other.
It was likely not in the Woman's Job description that she would be required to Shave/Wax a Man's Nether Regions pal. If the Woman had been told upfront that she would be required to do this should the need arise, she likely would not have accepted the job. Just because you are OK with your spouse Shaving Male Nether Regions doesn't make it acceptable in any way, shape or form.
Kids today are told how they are so special and unique. You release them to the world, and they can't handle the reality. I'm special! How dare you reject me!
Again, Paul is the apostle of the Gentiles, Rom. 11:13. Signs/miracles are for the Jews. John 4:48; 1Corinthians 1:22. Again, if you have read it then you would know.
Um, so people who lost their land are prophesied to get it back and ... after two millennia finally get it back. Um, lets see, prophesize something that they would obviously want, then actively try to make the prophecy happen, including using the prophecy and the claim that it is theirs to justify getting it back. That is really the best you have to 'prove' prophesy of the bible? Really really weak. Like claiming something that is an obvious thing to people to try to achieve, then people who actively want it and know of the prophecy actively try to achieve it. Only real surprise is that it took them that long.
Former WH press secretary.
Even Christ's FIRST coming didn't meet the expectations of prophecy. The MESSIAH as foretold was to be a great warrior who would destroy the enemies of the Hebrews. That's why Jews of the time didn't believe Jesus was the Savior. Because he wasn't slaughtering the Romans. And they were convinced when the Romans crucified him, without any semblance of resistance.
Science can explain what you call "love". Science can explain why you believe in a god.
lol. Okay thanks.
But you haven?t offered any basis for a criteria to use to reject some things and embrace others. You refer to objective morality, while whimsically dismissing portions of ?god breathed? scripture. If that?s the case, any scripture can be suspect, in which case you also have no basis for an objective morality if it?s left to ?a set of reinterpretations?. Taking scripture literally and dismissing parts of it, are two different things. ?
You can't write a biography about somebody who never existed. The gospels are fiction. You can call them biographical fiction if you wish. I call them religious propaganda written by the Churchmen to filch wealth, power and young male children to themselves.